asked

In a public sector workers compensation case in the District of Columbia, the complainant requested a hearing for restored medical treatment and lost wage compensation. The Agency rescinded the denial of medical benefits before the hearing, leading the government to argue the case was moot. However, the Administrative Law Judge allowed the lost wage issue to proceed. The government then filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the only appealed issue was medical treatment. How should I argue against the motion to dismiss, given that the Judge permitted the parties to brief the issues of court jurisdiction and the rules of the administrative agency state to follow Superior Court Rules if no administrative cases deal with the situation?

April 2nd, 2023

Sign Up to View Answers

Create an account to view answers and interact with the community!