Haley J. asked

⚖️  Law

Is any action brought against a medical doctor, deemed to be medical malpractice, even if the doctor is CEO of a huge non-profit (medical) transplant facility and the cause of action is intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), subject to a four-year statute of limitations? The origin of the offense resulting in the IIED cause was due to the plaintiff having been banned - not treated - by the CEO from the transplant facility unjustly. The Statute of Limitations (4 years vs. 2) is the issue.

August 17th, 2024

Eric C. answered

The key issue is whether the action against the medical doctor, who is also the CEO of a non-profit ...

August 17th, 2024

Sign Up to View Full Expert Answers

Create an account to view answers and interact with the community!