Lindsey S. asked

⚖️  Law

I sent interrogatories to the opposing party asking for a list of all persons and sources from whom they obtained any documentation or information related to my Facebook page. The opposing party objected, stating the interrogatory is argumentative, irrelevant to the stalking issue, and protected as privileged attorney work product. I have also filed a motion to compel the disclosure of who is tracking me on Facebook, which the judge deferred to the final hearing. How should I proceed with my motion to compel, and what does the statement 'the information sought is protected as privileged attorney work product' mean?

May 11th, 2023

Karen J. answered

To proceed with your motion to compel, you should explain to the court the relevance of the informat...

May 11th, 2023

Sign Up to View Full Expert Answers

Create an account to view answers and interact with the community!